<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Michael Moore and the Catholic Imagination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://theologyinthevineyard.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/michael-moore-and-the-catholic-imagination/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://theologyinthevineyard.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/michael-moore-and-the-catholic-imagination/</link>
	<description>Where theology meets politics, culture, economics and history</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 12:05:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: polpursun</title>
		<link>http://theologyinthevineyard.wordpress.com/2008/05/01/michael-moore-and-the-catholic-imagination/#comment-1902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[polpursun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 11:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theologyinthevineyard.wordpress.com/?p=302#comment-1902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The last sentence is provocative.  However, in context and with the application of empathic &quot;listening&quot; not non-understandable.  It evoked something I had written in a document a dozen years ago, viz:

What could be more reactive than the rationalization and projection of whites when faced with the pathology resulting from tens of decades of their malefic worldview?  The term whites, is used in the context of the previously delineated aphorism:---- Filtered through the lens of society, as undergirded by western philosophical thought, black is a state of being; it just so happens that most caucasians are white.  Skin color, I opine, in terms of analysis, is a superficial anachronism.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The last sentence is provocative.  However, in context and with the application of empathic &#8220;listening&#8221; not non-understandable.  It evoked something I had written in a document a dozen years ago, viz:</p>
<p>What could be more reactive than the rationalization and projection of whites when faced with the pathology resulting from tens of decades of their malefic worldview?  The term whites, is used in the context of the previously delineated aphorism:&#8212;- Filtered through the lens of society, as undergirded by western philosophical thought, black is a state of being; it just so happens that most caucasians are white.  Skin color, I opine, in terms of analysis, is a superficial anachronism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
