Patriarchy is dying Signs 14

One of the great Catholic prophets of our age,the Benedictine nun Joan Chittester has written:

The patriarchal society is essentially a violent thing in which man, the males of the system, own, administer, shape, or control all the major facets of the culture-is a stifling thing.

Women have been stalemated economically, socially and religiously. This is a given from which few would object. For Christians Chittester gets to the heart of the matter:

Patriarchy is theologically incongruent. The image of God has become totally male though God in scripture  said it was otherwise….It rests on four interlocking principles: dualism,hierarchy, domination and essential inequality. It takes biological differences, imposes hierarchy on them, gives hierarchy dominative power and justifies all of it on the theory of intrinsic inequality. But none of it stands to be justified by the life and teachings of Jesus.


n 1976 Pope Paul Vl requested that the Pontifical Biblical Commission, a permanent Vatican body of twenty biblical experts,  study the biblical evidence for and against women’s ordination. David Stanley SJ was one of these experts.

The Commission’s report was unanimous in finding,”the New Testament by itself alone will not permit us to settle in a clear way and once and for all the problem of the possible accession of women to the presbyterate priesthood.” Furthermore the Commission voted 12-5 in favour of women priests with one abstention and two absentees. The Bible, especially the New Testament, teaches very clearly the equality of man and woman in the spiritual domain (relationships with God) and in the moral area (relationships with other human beings). But the problem of the social condition of woman is a sociological problem that must be treated as such.”

The ultimate answer could only come from the ”living tradition” and that must include the sensus fidelium. And then the bombshell which sadly sealed the reputation of a very good man and  and a good pope caught between the demands of tradition and traditionalism.

Inter Insigniores the Vatican’s response was given in Rome a few months later: No women need apply. Even at this time, huge numbers rejected the conclusion. David Stanley resigned in disgust. He accused the authors of “flagrant disregard” for the evidence of the New Testament. And that was the end of Stanley’s job teaching scripture at the Jesuit run Gregorianum. Stanley would not be the first scholar thrown under the Vatican train. Under John Paul ll and his enforcer Josef Ratzinger  many more would be sacrificed.

The shallow  ecclesial justifications for this discrimination have been embarrassing in the extreme. The exclusion of women was culturally conditioned.Jesus lived in a rigidly patriarchal society yet he broke the mold in having serious female disciples.He ordained no one.The only priest in the New Testament is Jesus himself, the High Priest.The Spirit moving in culture gradually corrects the early understanding

Rome’s attempts to foreclose the discussion has been justifiably ridiculed and has been a cause of scandal in a Church which has prided itself on its deep respect for learning and reason.

Roy Bourgeois is merely the latest in a never ending line of truth tellers who will be made to walk the plank on this issue.Fr.Tony Flannery a Redemptorist priest in Ireland has been silenced by Rome for similar opinions His editor in the magazine  Reality,  Fr Gerry Moloney, apparently been told not to print any articles on celibacy, the use of contraception and the involvement of women in the clergy, for an unspecified period.

A similar firestorm has broken out in Austria. An “Appeal to Disobedience” signed  by 300 priests support the  discussion of the possibility of ordaining married men and women.Led by Monsignor Helmut Schüller, it  rejected the Cardinal’s trump card of obedience in favour of conscience saying that  Second Vatican Council had begun with an act of disobedience on the part of those bishops who had refused to sign the documents prepared by the Vatican.Clearly the austrian initiative believes that the  Spirit is calling the Church to a deeper understanding of priesthood based on the dignity and equality of all the baptized

The bishops chosen by Pope John Paul 11 are surrounding the laager ready to make a  last ditch stand to seal up this tomb of time bound thinking.

The revolution of female equality  in this case the evolution has taken a quantum leap forward in the past forty years Building on other historical struggles of women such as the suffragettes movement  itself an outgrowth of the abolitionist movement, female equality has gradually been sanctified and accepted save for dark corners of the Muslim world and apparently the Catholic church. People’s minds have changed and the Church stands convicted of sexism.

As Joan Chittester has put it “The old order is falling; the old world is over.It may yet be functioning,skeletal and bare, but it is clearly over.”

It is obvious to all but the aging men in the Vatican.


  1. 1

    Hey guys, let’s just stop and draw out the obvious. The Church is obviously out to lunch. The Church is able to stifle the Holy Spirit, obscure the truth of scripture, create a structure that is so contrary to the teachings of Jesus, disfigure the Church so much that what we are left with is so utterly unrecognizable, so utterly contrary to the way Jesus wants them to be, etc. It is obvious that Jesus has no power. He is not who he said he is. How can he be? If he is the Son of God, if he raised someone from the dead, if he holds the keys of life and death, then he would be able to preserve the truth in his Church. He would have the power to shape the face of the Church into the figure he wills for it. But clearly he cannot do that. The obvious conclusion in all of this is that Jesus is not who he said he is. He is only a human being who made outrageous claims. The Church is merely a human institution, it is corrupt, it is patriarchal, hierarchical, domineering, dictatorial, misogynistic, homophobic, indifferent to the plight of the poor, etc., etc., therefore it cannot be what Jesus wants it to be, and therefore Jesus cannot be what the Church claims he is, namely, human and divine. If he is divine, he has the power to have his will prevail. His will does not prevail. Let’s not waste any time. Buddhism is a better religion. It is not patriarchal, domineering, dictatorial, etc. What are we doing hanging around in this outdated medieval Church? Do we think we are going to change it? Buddhism is clearly a better religion. In fact, Aboriginal spirituality is much better. They have sacraments (i.e., smudging, smoking, etc). Clearly, this Church has had it wrong for 2000 years, and Jesus is powerless to do anything about it, so why are you so foolishly hanging on to this?

    Of course, I don’t believe this. But I would like to know why you do not.

  2. 2

    Hey Ted: You’ll enjoy this. You should hire this lady as a columnist for this site:

  3. 3

    You’ll enjoy this too, Ted:

RSS Feed for this entry

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: